lichess.org
Donate

Adding a comments section to each tactics puzzle

This is a feature request of mine and I believe this would be a great upgrade to the tactics puzzle module for the following reasons:

1. There are currently many, many faulty problems. Problems where outright winning moves or moves that directly transpose to the winning line are marked incorrect. If I or others were to write a comment about each one it would just pollute this forum. Having the comments attached to the puzzle itself keeps everything self-contained.

2. I have largely abstained from voting up problems as I have observed that many of the faulty problems have a large positive voting record. This is due to users who have, through luck or insight, hit on the accepted solution without ever seeing the faulty side of the problem*. By seeing the grievances pointed out by other solvers we could make a more informed decision when voting on a puzzle.
* (Due to this I think a grading system would be better than the current unbounded voting system)

3. It would be useful as a learning tool for users to read the ideas of others in order to clarify why the solution works or why the non-solutions don't. Sure, we could use the "play against the computer" feature, but this is not a good substitute as it doesn't always amply explain why the moves work or do not and Stockfish does not always play the most testing or enlightening moves from a human perspective.

4. We would see others who have stumbled over the same ideas or found the same beauty in the solution and that's a good feeling :)
Or even better, the site should stop using randmly generated puzzles. Each puzzle must be 'verified' first and the correct solution should be found, only then it should be added to the database.
+1

I myself, am terrible at tactics so having everything that Zwisch would help me alot.
i am too weak to see most of, if not all these faulty problems sir zwisch speaks of but i agree about having comments available. there are many times i try a move and fail to understand why it was a poor decision. i imagine others may make similar poor decisions and having a quick comment or line reminding us what we should have seen may save us the time with playing machine to find out. granted this added process/time may better help one understand the idea they over looked but for people like me i often am upset enough i do not invest any extra time understanding and try to move on. thus making my learning curve steeper than most as i continue to make similar mistakes. it may help some feel better to know that others played similar moves so together we got this problem wrong and together we can continue to evolve our chess skills. rather than feeling like you are the only mongo out there that can not solve the puzzle and you were the only one to make the move you did.

another idea along the topic of puzzles:
this maybe difficult to implement but the idea is to have the move/line played evaluated and the puzzle rating are assessed based on your decision.

most puzzles are cut and dry but for those puzzles with a grey area which zwisch calls attention too maybe other ideas can be say a 1600 rated problem where as the flat out mating/best moves are say 1900.

thank you for your time.
live long and prosper.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.