000 inaccuracy
en.lichess.org/n6wii82j/blackalthough like some wise member said, many of us have developed a fear of the 0 inacc lol in fear of being mistaken for a cheat :)
in any case the guy did not play as a 1950 tbh or did he ?
Please stop posting 20 moves games. You can even do 0 inaccuracies in bullet in 20 moves
lol you are right pal, and thats something i feel jealouse towards cuz ive worked my butt off and always get lots of inaccs, so hope u dont mind my sharing my final success in this regard :)
Don't worry so much about inaccuracies. In general getting a 0/0/0 is going to be more a result of your opponent playing poorly than you playing well. Look at top level games even in 40 move in 2 hours + increment type time controls, and you'll very rarely see 0/0/0 games from the best players in the world. It's just that their opponent's pose them enough practical problems that playing computer flawless is effectively impossible for a human.
Aiming for 0/0/0 games could actually hurt your play since it's going to encourage a very passive, very defensive style where it's easier to minimize your own mistakes.
Nonetheless there should have been a congrats up in that above post somewhere. So, congrats! ;-)
Again, good advice LM, Thank you :))
there is not much point in a perfect game...
However if you make exactly 7 inaccuracies then boom! you get 007 and a hidden license
@LM OhNoMyPants #4
>> Look at top level games even in 40 move in 2 hours +
>> increment type time controls, and you'll very rarely see 0/0/0
>> games from the best players in the world.
I've imported and seen several 000 or 100 games from top GMs now and from the past. It is not that very unusual. Also in really long drawn games both top GMs can have 000 or 100.
People seems to have forgot another aspect of that 000. Stockfish analyze a whole game in very short time which means very little time on each move. That means 000 isn't necessarily a perdect game 100%.