It is necessary that chess was shown on television.
Would be advertising money.
Classic chess, fall out of the TV capabilities.
Need a quick chess, they will have the money.
How long to wait for this event!
Here in autumn 2015 was the championship on fast chess and blitz the country in which it was possible to watch on TV and not on the Internet?
Players will adapt to any control, just an element of luck is increased in a quick game.
If anyone watched the candidates matches isn't made a paradoxical conclusion: let the players sit at the Board. and they will find where to spend time.
They sat at the Board for 7 hours and still made mistakes.
Perfect top chess players are not shown.
Debut of new items will have a greater effect in rapid chess, and it'll be more intrigue in the game.
If it goes to rapid games will be playing us a collection of masterpieces that can be measured in an order of magnitude higher than it is now.
It remains to wait for the lack of sponsors on the candidates cycle and the world do FIDE no more choice but to compete in rapid chess and blitz.
Blitz and the Internet can be performed in special centers or allowing out of the house.
Then the tournaments could gather tens of thousands of players from around the world and the prizes and money and TV broadcast...
This will be a milestone in the development of chess. Prosperity among other sports. The level of tennis which Ilyumzhinov has compared chess, but the comparison is not in favor of chess.
The theory develops it may not prevent strong to play better, but for the weak there is a thread for ideas for their game.
Would be advertising money.
Classic chess, fall out of the TV capabilities.
Need a quick chess, they will have the money.
How long to wait for this event!
Here in autumn 2015 was the championship on fast chess and blitz the country in which it was possible to watch on TV and not on the Internet?
Players will adapt to any control, just an element of luck is increased in a quick game.
If anyone watched the candidates matches isn't made a paradoxical conclusion: let the players sit at the Board. and they will find where to spend time.
They sat at the Board for 7 hours and still made mistakes.
Perfect top chess players are not shown.
Debut of new items will have a greater effect in rapid chess, and it'll be more intrigue in the game.
If it goes to rapid games will be playing us a collection of masterpieces that can be measured in an order of magnitude higher than it is now.
It remains to wait for the lack of sponsors on the candidates cycle and the world do FIDE no more choice but to compete in rapid chess and blitz.
Blitz and the Internet can be performed in special centers or allowing out of the house.
Then the tournaments could gather tens of thousands of players from around the world and the prizes and money and TV broadcast...
This will be a milestone in the development of chess. Prosperity among other sports. The level of tennis which Ilyumzhinov has compared chess, but the comparison is not in favor of chess.
The theory develops it may not prevent strong to play better, but for the weak there is a thread for ideas for their game.