evolution or creation

@Alientcp why do you always understand the opposite of what I write?
I was telling @ddfjdfjh to watch the videos you linked. Not the opposite.

"You people use way too many notes"
Wolfgang

@polylogarithmique said in #51:
> @Alientcp why do you always understand the opposite of what I write?
> I was telling ddfjdfjh to watch the videos you linked. Not the opposite.

LOL. Dude. You tagged me and my tag was the first sentence of the file, i ignored the rest as it wasnt meant for me.
Dont tag me if its not for me.

#41: I've always thought of human evolution as a system akin to the behavioral concept of nudging, which would both fall in line with the general randomness of evolution and allow for occasional divine intervention.
Of course, that again presupposes that an omniscient, omnipotent being's decision-making framework is compatible with human logic.
Bottom line-- esotericism and logic needn't mix.

@Alientcp said in #53:
> LOL. Dude. You tagged me and my tag was the first sentence of the file, i ignored the rest as it wasnt meant for me.
> Dont tag me if its not for me.
Well if you read only half, don't be surprised if you get the opposite of what is written.

@clousems well ok. That would make sense. Though I don't know why you would need the hypothesis of nudging when evolution based on pure randomness is a sufficient explanation.

Huh? I just received a PM followed by a block, so ima put this here .

@Alientcp said in #53:
> LOL. Dude. You tagged me and my tag was the first sentence of the file, i ignored the rest as it wasnt meant for me.
> Dont tag me if its not for me.
>You are an hypocrite. Your tag wasn't the first sentence of the file, and you couldn't have missed that. I mean you >deleted the beginning of the quote (you even deleted the ">" and forgot to put it back) so you perfectly knew >what was in it.
>I don't know why you are doing this. You probably think you're very smart and I guess you find it amusing to piss >me off for the sake of it.
>Well if that's the case, you're just immature and pathetic.

Now, im just going to clarify.

@Alientcp said in #53:
>You are an hypocrite. Your tag wasn't the first sentence of the file, and you couldn't have missed that.

ibb.co/M1KqJPD

My nick was the first sentence of that file, i ignored the rest. But start reading from there, and you may see why i got confused.

>I mean you deleted the beginning of the quote (you even deleted the ">" and forgot to put it back) so you perfectly knew what was in it.

No i didnt deleted a thing, at least not on purpose. I just took what i thought you said TO ME. i removed the first row as it wasnt for me, i mean, i get now that nothing of it was, but i thought that part was, so i was kinda confused as i did not understood what you meant by "linked".

ibb.co/Q9NtdFY

Hence i ask to what? The book? I thought you were asking the other guy to watch the videos and me to read the book, hence the explanation of why i wouldnt do it. I got that idea because of a previous quote you posted.
I honestly thought you told both of us to cross check the arguments.

>I don't know why you are doing this. You probably think you're very smart and I guess you find it amusing to piss me off for the sake of it.

I got confused to what you meant, derived from reading from my tag and onwards.

>Well if that's the case, you're just immature and pathetic.

Im not the one blocking people after sending a PM.



It was a simple confusion, i dont know why you get so aggravated lol. I mean i dont mind the block, i dont send PMs anyways, i just reply when people do.

It’s hard to take the OP seriously when they don’t even know what the word “theory” means. No creationist does. They simply parrot that term even after being corrected and told numerous times what a scientific theory is. (As if their own unsupported magick has any evidence at all.) Invincible ignorance!

Hey!
I did not follow the discussion but I have a lot to say on the subject. The question is is it worth it? That is, no one here really intends to listen to the other side, but only to prove the righteousness of his way. Everyone here has raised some axioms and he is trying to prove them. Yes me too. I am a believing Jew. Therefore the discussion is unnecessary. Unless there is someone here who has not formed an opinion and his purpose in the discussion is to be convinced out of a desire to reach the truth. Is there anyone like that? say the truth? If there is, I am ready to participate!

anyway it is a suprising that there is not any scepticism for those who believe in evolution or creation...
evolutionists said that universe is about 5 billion years old, Earth about 2,5 billion years old and mankind about 3 million years...
creationists saying, based on Bible - Earth is about 7500-8000 years old, creaton scientists say Earth can't be older than 10 000 years...
but it is their research, not of those who read what they conclude or saw and hear their work and oppinion. i think everyone should be sceptic about anything, iff you are not in school and had to learn what is in books, you must be sceptic on anyone thought...