@ddfjdfjh said in #5:
> @Alientcp did You read book by Robert Gentry "Little mistery of creation". There he explains how he found radium in the rock of granite, which decomposes into polonium, he found three rings of decay of radium to polonium.........
Rock formation has 0% to do with evolution.
From wiki.
"His self-published book Creation's Tiny Mystery was reviewed by geologist Gregg Wilkerson, who said that it has several logical flaws and concluded that "the book is a source of much misinformation about current geologic thinking and confuses fact with interpretation." Wilkerson also noted that the book contains considerable autobiographical material and he observed that "[i]n general I don't think educators will find it's worth their time to tread through this creationist's whining."[23] This criticism of Gentry's "frequent whining about discrimination" has also been made by fellow creationists, who concluded that "his scientific snubs resulted more from his own abrasive style than from his peculiar ideas", according to critic Ronald L. Numbers, a historian of science"
And information from the 70's is already 50 years obsolete. I have an encyclopedia from the 80's that showed that pluto was not the farthest planet, it was neptune, and it was true due to the extreme elliptical orbit of pluto. but now pluto is the farthest planet (if we count it as one), which is also true.
If you want to debunk the evolution, watch the philogeny challenge video, watch the playlist, and if you really find the flaw, publish a paper and i guarantee you, you get the nobel prize. But if you dont watch it, you will keep the wrong idea that geology is part of evolution.
Just watch the damm videos and learn.
> @Alientcp did You read book by Robert Gentry "Little mistery of creation". There he explains how he found radium in the rock of granite, which decomposes into polonium, he found three rings of decay of radium to polonium.........
Rock formation has 0% to do with evolution.
From wiki.
"His self-published book Creation's Tiny Mystery was reviewed by geologist Gregg Wilkerson, who said that it has several logical flaws and concluded that "the book is a source of much misinformation about current geologic thinking and confuses fact with interpretation." Wilkerson also noted that the book contains considerable autobiographical material and he observed that "[i]n general I don't think educators will find it's worth their time to tread through this creationist's whining."[23] This criticism of Gentry's "frequent whining about discrimination" has also been made by fellow creationists, who concluded that "his scientific snubs resulted more from his own abrasive style than from his peculiar ideas", according to critic Ronald L. Numbers, a historian of science"
And information from the 70's is already 50 years obsolete. I have an encyclopedia from the 80's that showed that pluto was not the farthest planet, it was neptune, and it was true due to the extreme elliptical orbit of pluto. but now pluto is the farthest planet (if we count it as one), which is also true.
If you want to debunk the evolution, watch the philogeny challenge video, watch the playlist, and if you really find the flaw, publish a paper and i guarantee you, you get the nobel prize. But if you dont watch it, you will keep the wrong idea that geology is part of evolution.
Just watch the damm videos and learn.
